February 07, 2006
An Interesting Measure of Progress
NOTE: You have probably found this blog through a Search Engine. This blog
has switched from Movable Type to WordPress. Unfortunately, I am not able to offer
an easy redirect. For a while, I will keep the original posts up, but you CANNOT LEAVE
COMMENTS from these archive pages. To leave a comment, COPY the title of this post,
follow this link to the new site, and paste the title into the SEARCH window.
You will be able to leave a comment on the new blog page. Thanks!
To the Wayback Machine, Sherman!
2004: Bush proposes a $2.3 trillion budget and vows to cut the deficit in half by 2009.
2006: Bush proposes a $2.8 trillion budget and vows to cut the deficit in half by 2009.
Care to predict what Bush will be saying in 2008?
The politicians do treat the electorate like idiots, don't they? Why is it that we're so accepting that our elected representatives are liars, such that we no longer turn a hair when we hear of evidence of same?
Posted by: Brad at February 7, 2006 10:39 AM
"Sorry, guys, I tried! Now off to Tijuana since I no longer have responsibilities and a generous pension! Not to mention the sweet presidential pajamas!"
Posted by: unrelatedwaffle at February 7, 2006 11:48 AM
I think the Republicans have done a horrible job of dealing with the budget and the deficit, and I think voters will punish them for it in Nov 2006.
Posted by: ykw at February 7, 2006 04:34 PM
I never thought I would be typing this; but, here we should be more fair to Dubya. The current deficits are only about one seventh as large as a couple of the deficits this country ran during World War II. I don't think it's particularly wise for progressives to criticize Bush on the deficits. If we truly wish to pull the U.S. out of Iraq, end the threats against Chavez, etc., and end these resource wars, we will then have to make the decision to eliminate all use of oil and natural gas as soon as possible. Such a massive and immediate power switch means that it would be beneficial, and probably even necessary, for the federal government to run substantially larger deficits for the next few years.
Posted by: see at February 9, 2006 05:15 AM

